Authors
On the heels of December's Transparency in Coverage proposed rule, which seeks to evolve the data included in payer machine-readable files (MRF). Turquoise has submitted a public comment focused on a number of different areas. Summarily, we:
- Support clearer standards and definitions, particularly around provider networks, and stronger structural guidance to improve rate uniformity
- Request clarity to create a more structured file ecosystem, including a robust table of contents (TOC) that clearly links plans, networks, and related files
- Point to alignment with hospital price transparency efforts so MRF standards converge
- Align with the Departments’ changes that improve data completeness and usability, including enhanced out-of-network allowed amount reporting and additional files providing contextual data
- Affirm the Departments’ prioritization of accessibility and automation, backing standardized file discovery, removal of technical access barriers, and a single open format (JSON)
- Recommend practical, proportionate implementation timelines
See inside the black box.
Traceable data, unified workflows, and total transparency
Related resources
Learn, listen, and watch the latest on price transparency.
To patients, AI-generated perception is the new price for your drug
Here’s how you can control the cost narrative vacuum yourself
Life Sciences
