Public comment
No Surprises Act (NSA)
Good faith estimates
Price transparency regulations
Transparency compliance

Turquoise's public comment on CMS-0042-NC

Turquoise's public comment on CMS-0042-NC

We're in full support of CMS' commitment to using price transparency data and innovative frameworks to create binding upfront cost estimates. We focused our feedback on two specific sections of the RFI — PC-12 and TD-19 — regarding binding cost estimates and price transparency implementation.

Download PDF

Related resources

Learn, listen, and watch the latest on price transparency.

Turquoise's public comment on CMS 9882-P
Transparency in Coverage (TiC)

Turquoise's public comment on CMS 9882-P

Transparency in Coverage files are on the verge of a much-needed overhaul to become leaner, more organized, and more useful.

Turquoise's public comment on CMS-1834-P
Public comment

Turquoise's public comment on CMS-1834-P

Turquoise Health's public comment on CMS-1834-P supporting comprehensive hospital MRF standards, seeking clarification on new percentile fields, and providing recommendations on EDI 835 ERA transaction data utility. Read our full analysis.

Turquoise's public comment on CMS hospital price transparency accuracy and completeness RFI
Public comment

Turquoise's public comment on CMS hospital price transparency accuracy and completeness RFI

Turquoise Health's full response to the CMS hospital price transparency accuracy & completeness RFI defining accuracy and completeness of MRF data and recommending how CMS should enforce meaningful compliance going forward. Read our full analysis.