All reports
Public comment
Hospital Price Transparency Rule
Machine-readable files (MRF)
Hospital data quality
Transparency compliance

Turquoise's public comment on CMS-1834-P

Turquoise's public comment on CMS-1834-P

Turquoise Health is in full support of CMS' commitment to creating methodical, comprehensive, and accurate hospital machine-readable files (MRFs). In our detailed responses, we seek additional clarification and specificity with regards to the new percentile fields and methodology. We also provide recommendations on the utility of EDI 835 ERA transaction data.

Download PDF

Related resources

Learn, listen, and watch the latest on price transparency.

View all
Turquoise's public comment on CMS 9882-P
Transparency in Coverage (TiC)

Turquoise's public comment on CMS 9882-P

Transparency in Coverage files are on the verge of a much-needed overhaul to become leaner, more organized, and more useful.

Turquoise's public comment on CMS hospital price transparency accuracy and completeness RFI
Public comment

Turquoise's public comment on CMS hospital price transparency accuracy and completeness RFI

Turquoise Health's full response to the CMS hospital price transparency accuracy & completeness RFI defining accuracy and completeness of MRF data and recommending how CMS should enforce meaningful compliance going forward. Read our full analysis.

Turquoise's public comment on CMS-9882-NC
Public comment

Turquoise's public comment on CMS-9882-NC

Turquoise Health's public comment on CMS-9882-NC supporting the expansion of price transparency to include prescription drugs and making the case for comprehensive drug rate disclosure as critical healthcare infrastructure. Read our full analysis.